INTELLEGENCE- Opening sequence (FINAL CUT)

Production sceduling - Makquel Marshall

Evaluation queation 7

INTELLIGENCE -Third draft

Risk assessment

Evaluation question 5

Evaluation question 6

Evaluation question 4

who would be the audience for your media product?



The audience for the opening sequence is aimed at males aged 16-21 but mostly late teenagers. The actors in the opening sequence are also in this age boundary, this allows the audience to be engaged as they can relate and build a relationship with the characters, expectations will be fulfilled by witnessing actors in their generation perform these roles. Furthermore as we are also in the age boundary we can construct the extract best for the targeted audience as we understand modern day society and share the same experiences. Our target audience will understand and relate to our appealing opening sequence. 

Audience profile:  

Gender: male

Age: 16-21

Occupation/education: College, sixth form

Hobbies/interests: Video games, technology, social media, action/crime drama films,

Dislikes: Romance films, fashion, shopping

This is my ideal target audience as his profile suggests he will enjoy and relate to our product.

Evaluation question 3

Evaluation question 2

Evaluation question 2
Click this link!!!!

Evaluation question 1

Content to fill-Charlie Todd

Audience feedback-script

Audience Feedback storyboard

Audience Feedback - Extract

Audience feedback – Extract/ opening sequence (Draft 2)

 

Main advantages given by peers and Miss Gatty:

• Good variety of camera angles throughout extract
• Good use of editing overall, not too many cuts which allows flow
• Need to include a suitable score/soundtrack for the extract
• A suitable length for this extract to sustain the audience’s attention
• Close ups were used correctly to emphasises important facial expressions

 

Main disadvantages given by peers and Miss Gatty

• The close up of the mi6 logo at the end of the extract was blurry and hard to see
• The characters within the extract were described as ‘unrealistic’ because they were too young for the working environment
• At times in the extract the camera was unstable
• The text in the extract was described as unprofessional
   

What improvements have we done from our feedback?

The mi6 logo was removed from the extract, we felt as if it was the best thing to do as it was visually unpleasing. As we were unable to attempt the scene we had to use and elongate other scenes to fill in the missing gap.

Unfortunately we were unable to change our actors as no one else was available, therefore the production is forced to challenge the stereotypical agent/receptionist however, and this may be an advantage as the actor is a similar age as the audience. This will give the audience someone to relate to in a sense; also they could make a relationship with the character.

We are unable to film again due to the production deadline therefore we have to ignore the unstableness of the camera.

The typography has been dramatically improved by Marcel Deane, Miss Gatty has also stated it looks considerably better, the text font and position has changed improving the visuals of the extract.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My analysis of survey results

Forgotten qestion for survey results: Reserach and plannning

Second draft

First darft

Forgotten queastion for survey

Would you watch a crime drama that was made by an independent production, if not why?

Release form template

Location/equipment/personnel organisation Production scheduling/ gantt chart Makquel Marshall

Trailer analysis

requesting permission to film confirmation by Marcel Deane

Production meeting notes by Makquel Marshall

Gannt Chart by Makquel Marshall